In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Levine
Cited by
- Pelchat v. Banner Health Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Bellamy v. Rollins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- brown/mariscalv. Zoley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Walk v. Ring 44 P.3d 990 Ariz. 2002
- CDT, Inc. v. Addison, Roberts & Ludwig, C.P.A., P.C. 7 P.3d 979 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
- Doe v. Miles Inc. 945 P.2d 1304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
- Doe v. Roe 931 P.2d 1115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
- Floyd v. Donahue 923 P.2d 875 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
- Vega v. Morris 910 P.2d 6 Ariz. 1996
- Vega v. Morris 905 P.2d 535 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Matter of Levine 174 Ariz. 146
Opinion text
ORDER The Court has considered the Respondent’s Affidavit in lieu of Application for Reinstatement. It appears that the State Bar, by and through its Chief Bar Counsel, has no objection to the reinstatement of Respondent. Therefore, pursuant to Rule 71(c) of the Rules of the Supreme Court, IT IS ORDERED affirming the terms of probation as set forth in the Opinion filed February 18, 1993, 174 Ariz. 146 , 847 P.2d 1093 , with the exception that the terms of Respondent’s payment of restitution, fees, costs and expenses will be determined by a payment schedule agreed to between Respondent and the State Bar. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent be and he hereby is reinstated and may resume the practice of law upon entry of this order. /s/ Stanley G. Feldman STANLEY G. FELDMAN Chief Justice